2016-03-02 23:22 GMT-08:00 Erik Moeller eloquence@gmail.com:
Jimmy made a couple of suggestions earlier [1], including to publish all presentations given to the Board and to have a trusted community observer.
"Nearly all", to paraphrase accurately, and on re-reading the email I'm not sure I understand the "observer" idea ("a program of invited board observers from people who are well known and well trusted by the community"). Personally, I do find it intriguing but I'm not sure it would add much value transparency-wise, unless these observers play some kind of role in the discussion of what gets published, i.e. they effectively act as advocates for transparency.
When it comes to presentations, the manual primarily refers to exceptions such as Legal presentations and documents "intended for presentation".
That should read: "intended for publication".
Erik (and now I'm really over my quota)