2016-03-02 23:22 GMT-08:00 Erik Moeller <eloquence(a)gmail.com>om>:
Jimmy made a couple of suggestions earlier ,
including to publish
all presentations given to the Board and to have a trusted community
"Nearly all", to paraphrase accurately, and on re-reading the email
I'm not sure I understand the "observer" idea ("a program of invited
board observers from people who are well known and well trusted by the
community"). Personally, I do find it intriguing but I'm not sure it
would add much value transparency-wise, unless these observers play
some kind of role in the discussion of what gets published, i.e. they
effectively act as advocates for transparency.
When it comes to presentations, the manual primarily
exceptions such as Legal presentations and documents "intended for
That should read: "intended for publication".
Erik (and now I'm really over my quota)