On 9/9/07, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/09/2007, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org>
wrote:
Agreed, but not applicable, as what would be
ethical would be to start
following the GFDL.
Of course, from a legal standpoint, that'd be irrelevant, since the
WMF has already had its rights terminated under the GFDL (see section
9).
WMF is not a publisher so it's rights are irrelevant.
True, I suppose, in which case every single person who has ever edited
a Wikipedia article has had their rights terminated under section 9.
Wikipedia
documents are within the GFDL as long as you consider the entire
document (the article text, the history and various other bits) rather
than a single page.
Perhaps you could point me to the title page which lists the five
principal authors of the Document, then.
Strangely the GFDL does not state the the title page and history page
cannot be the same thing.
--
geni