On 10/09/2007, Axel Boldt <axelboldt(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
--- geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
And the derivs? You would risk shredding
wikipedia.
Should any contributors show up who don't want their material
distributed under CC-BY-SA, you just ask them what text in current
articles was written by them, and you delete it.
No. Have to delete back a a version prior to their first edit unless
than edit was outright reverted. otherwise work will be derive of non
CC stuff.
Can't. We
don't have the capacity to delete on that scale.
I expect the scale to be minuscule.
With the number of GFDL only images around I think not. Wouldn't take
many of the more active editors to give us a massive deletion problem.
Nope.
Dissagreement over what counts as a deriv is rather
significant.
The term "derivative work" occurs in both licenses and its meaning
cannot be changed by a license text; it's defined by law and by the
courts.
The relevant terms are aggregation vs collective
Various comments by the two organisations exasperate matters.
--
geni