Hoi,
What reason would there be that is consistent with the aims of the Wikimedia
Foundation. What reason could be given that explicitly does not negate your
wish for the deletion of the mo.wikipedia?
You can not have it both ways imho.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 13 October 2010 17:59, Gutza <gutza(a)moongate.ro> wrote:
On 13-Oct-10 18:52, Milos Rancic wrote:
There are also some rewrite rules. For example, the default (based on
amount of texts written in Cyrillic; however, script-neutral) of
Serbian Wikipedia is Cyrillic. If you go to
http://sr.wikipedia.org/
-- you will find the page in Cyrillic. However, if you go to
http://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/ -- you'll find the same page in Latin
script.
Milos,
When I said a JavaScript gadget I meant a JavaScript gadget. As per
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Gadget, where these things are
defined like so: "a JavaScript and/or a CSS snippet that can be enabled
simply by checking an option in your Wikipedia preferences".
Rewrite rules with engines and stuff are NOT JavaScript gadgets -- they
are rewrite rules with engines and stuff. That will not be accepted by
the ro.wiki community in a million years, unless the Red Army occupies
the country and the ro.wiki community is contributing from labor camps.
Gutza
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l