On 4/23/07, Erik Moeller <erik(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
== 1) The Copyright Liberators ==
OUTCOME: Acquiring copyrighted materials that would be useful to our
projects (see [[m:copyright wishlist]] on meta which followed Jimmy's
$100M brainstorming question).
HOW TO GET THE MONEY: This seems like a task ideally suited for an
organization exclusively dedicated to it, rather than WMF. I'm only
aware of a few disjointed efforts by individuals in this direction
right now. I could imagine some billionaire philanthropist might be
willing to endow such an effort. Grants for liberation would be
difficult, but a [[Blender (software)]]-style fundraiser for the
community-driven liberation of specific works might be doable (WMF
could potentially direct some broad attention to such an effort).
RISKS: You can essentially sink infinite amounts of money into this
that might be better spent elsewhere. My key question would be whether
we could not benefit much more if we invested much smaller amounts of
money in a joined copyright reform strategy, together with various
other organizations of the broadly defined "Free Culture" movement.
MY CONCLUSION: I'd support allocating some funds to develop a good
software platform for this and then spin it off into a separate
organization that partners with ours. I'm also interested in
sustainable resourcing strategies that do not require spending
incoming revenue that is needed elsewhere.
<snippage>
.
.
.
*locating and scanning old PD materials
Sounds like something that can be ideally done by interns, students,
and volunteers if provided with a physical space & equipment to do it.
This might interest you...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/6586205.stm
--
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]