2) Regarding "Our BLP policy has worked.",
that's a fascinating
argument that the super-injunction *is* worthwhile. If Wikipedia
defines verifiability in terms of major media sources, and the
super-injunction inhibits those sources, then it effectively
inhibits Wikipedia (even if it's impolitic to put it that way).
I actually believe that the accumulated sourcing now *should* satisfy
Wikipedia's verification requirements in the case of the footballer,
and was tempted to make that argument. But given I have a nontrivial
connection to UK jurisdiction, plus I'm sure I'd get a huge amount
of personal attack due to the various politics, it wasn't worth it.
Just observing, on various talk pages, I believe the WP:NOTCENSORED
faction has made its sourcing argument poorly. Maybe there's another
lesson there as to relative costs imposed.
--
Seth Finkelstein
Google searches for "superinjunction" "Name of footballer" "name
of
squeeze" yields no hits at reliable sources.
Fred