For what it's worth, there has been previous discussions of having external reviews of WMF spending, such as a peer review from a similar institution. I think that this is a good idea. This also fits in with my long-standing hope that WMF will become more transparent with its financial expenditures.
Pine
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Risker risker.wp@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 May 2017 at 11:52, rupert THURNER rupert.thurner@gmail.com wrote:
Why the amount is missing for the WMF?
Rupert
Hello Rupert -
The Funds Dissemination Committee is not tasked with recommending funding for the Wikimedia Foundation; the committee only reviews and provides feedback on the draft annual plan.
Risker/Anne _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe