You see, there already someone with another POV on the matter of that user. I think this is the "correct" POV.
Watch and weep: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Wm2_YaRNbU
M., We all have perceptions. It's inherent to a the fact that we are all human beings. My perception is based on the facts that I quoted on my answer to Pedro. As anybody can see is not based on domination, but on Grammar (do you really want me to send you a bunch of citations of Portuguese Language grammars?) Yours is based on The Emperor's New Clothes?
Muhammad, an RFC on Meta? That's one of the best jokes I've read on this list in a long time. You must have missed my post of Dec. 5, under the subject "Fwd: Re: [VereinDE-l] Bericht zur Verleihung der Zedler-Me..."
David, Is there anything else more important for my students and me? Would you rather have me discuss if Jimmy Wales should appear in the fundraising banners with a clean shaven face of a full beard of considerable length (both can be accomplished using Photoshop, I would not want the man to change is personal style of choice) and the impact of both alternatives on the donations? I don't think so.
Thank you all for your undeserved attention.
Sincerely,
Virgilio A. P. Machado (Vapamachado) The only Wikipedian that has been dealt with by an arbcom by his real name, NOT his user name!
At 01:09 07-12-2010, you wrote:
I had a rather different impression of events around Pieter. I remember several times where he got admins on his case because he nominated copyvios for deletion which said admins had uploaded to Commons.
I'm also not sure whether a sarcastic reference to German efficiency in a talk page discussion qualifies as a racist remark. Etc.
Andreas