History does not require a judge. It's the storiography to be judge.
Here the problem is to give relevance to some sources and to neglect
(completely) others.
If a single not neutral source is considered as the Holy Bible, the same
pillars of Wikipedia are infringed.
Kind regards
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, 14:06 Dennis During <dcduring(a)gmail.com wrote:
Who is the judge? Are we going to join Facebook,
Google, Twitter, et al as
the new press barons?
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>