On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Stephen Bain <stephen.bain(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Anthony
<wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
This post below, I've pretty much ignored
because it wasn't worth trying to sort through who said what.
Yet instead of deleting it, you included the whole thing.
Correct. It wasn't worth reading, but it was useful as an example of
something that isn't worth reading.
Yeah, it sucks for people reading their mail with a 2400 bps modem, but I
don't think everyone else should have to suffer through ambiguous messages
for the sake of those few.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Svip <svippy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I am still uncertain whether his comment that it was
an example of a
'good toppost' was a joke, because I am getting that feeling.
No, wasn't a joke. Sometimes topposting is good. Specifically, when you
are replying to a message in its entirety, and not any particular part of
it. This was an example.