On 22/09/2007, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
As a Brit, I'm pleased to see London was
considered. Why was it the
only non-US city considered, though? I'm also curious as to why you
considered San Francisco better than London - to my knowledge, London
is a far more international city that San Francisco, which I would
think was a major consideration is choosing a base for the WMF.
I'm imagining difficulties with the prices. The pound sterling is the
depleted uranium of currency, and London is expensive even in that
context. Not to mention in running a US charity from the UK.
- d.