Emmanuel,
I have my concerns as well so we're watching how things unfold for now. Perhaps to add to Teemu's question (If I could be so bold) how would internet.org need to evolve to make it worth our time and effort to be involved?
--Kul
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Emmanuel Engelhart kelson@kiwix.orgwrote:
I'm maybe too pessimistic, but I would be really surprised if this project, at any time, really helps to provide an access (neutral) to the Internet.
More probable: They will try to give a free/cheap access to a set of their online services and so one do the same like AOL or MSN have tried to do 15 years ago.
... or like we do with Wikipedia zero... but, to the contrary to this alliance, Wikimedia has never claimed that they wanted to give access to the Internet.
So, IMO, this whole story about internet.org stinks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oFXCXQpJXI
Emmanuel
Le 23/08/2013 10:25, Leinonen Teemu a écrit :
Hi,
Have you noticed the new internet.org initiative by Facebook, Samsung,
Nokia, Qualcomm, Ericsson and MediaTek?
"Internet.org is a global partnership between technology leaders,
nonprofits, local communities and experts who are working together to bring the internet to the two thirds of the world’s population that doesn’t have it".[1, 2]
Would it make sense for the WMF's Wikipedia Zero program to collaborate
with this?
Any comments?
Best regards,
- Teemu[1] http://www.internet.org [2]
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/21/technology/facebook-leads-an-effort-to-low...
-- Kiwix - Wikipedia Offline & more
- Web: http://www.kiwix.org
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/KiwixOffline
- more: http://www.kiwix.org/wiki/Communication
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe