Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
If a proposed amendment fails to meet
community approval criteria it fails, and that's the end of it. It is
not the mandate of a subcommittee to override that. I am well aware of
the problem of inadequate community participation, but community silence
does not mean consent, and without a predetermined minimum level of
community participation no policy or policy amendment should be
considered as approved.
That is incorrect. The language subcommittee was specifically tasked
with formulating and implementing a language subdomain creation
policy. The committee furthermore did not override the community. Some
community members questioned the need for that clause (long after it
was introduced), and failed to achieve any consensus whatsoever on
whether to keep, change, or remove it. As such, no change was made.
Whether committees *should* make decisions or depend on the wider
community to do so is a very different discussion than whether they
*can*.
As an aside, I'm a little confused. You say that committees should not
make or change policies, but you are a member of the Provisional
Volunteer Council. Do you intend the PVC to simply be a proposal mill,
throwing out ideas for the community to debate?
--
Yours cordially,
Jesse Plamondon-Willard (Pathoschild)