Hoi,
As it is it will remain in this way unless
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Michael Everson <everson(a)evertype.com>wrote;wrote:
On 14 Nov 2008, at 11:30, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Because this is one of the most heavily fought
battles that did not
result in a situation that is acceptable to all.
Well, since "mo" is now deprecated, re-naming it "ro-Cyrl" can be
done
without really taking any decision. It's essentially cosmetic.
The issue is that the people behind the
mo.wikipedia are not living
anywhere near the areas involved and they are not native speakers/
writers either. It would have been good when this thing had been
just deleted because the pain would have worn off. However, the
decision was that when a native speaker comes along, it can be
restarted...
I don't understand. Is it to be deleted? Is it to be re-named? If not
the former, then surely the latter.
Michael Everson *
http://www.evertype.com
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l