that storing the geolocation of every reader
request is not within the letter or the spirit >of the Foundation's
privacy policy, which explicitly requires >consent for the use of geolocation
No, this is not correct. The reasons why this statement is incorrect have already been
discussed in the already mentioned thread.
On Nov 10, 2016, at 9:23 AM, James Salsman
<jsalsman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I repeat my request that the IP and proxy information be anonymized
with a secure cryptographic has before being stored to nonvolatile
media, and suggest that storing the geolocation of every reader
request is not within the letter or the spirit of the Foundation's
privacy policy, which explicitly requires consent for the use of
geolocation: