The core policies should be the ones pushed by board resolution, and those should be the absolute minimum required to keep the projects safe from a legal POV. Period. Otherwise, people with little understanding of small Wikipedias will try to push stuff from en.wp. Just recently someone was trying to have an RFC on meta on all the different processes that en.wp has and ro.wp does not have, with little consideration on whether the manpower to implement, let alone maintain, these processes exists. No thank you to rule pushing without local context.
Having a community take a rule from en.wp is different, just as long as some kind of discussion happens within the community about it. Even if the rule is really useless or harmful and the community did not realize that in the beginning, at least it can evolve differently from the English one. Have a centralized repository and trying to change the rules there by consensus would be much more difficult for small communities.
Strainu
2017-08-02 17:05 GMT+03:00 John Erling Blad jeblad@gmail.com:
Nearly all Wikipedia projects has virtually the same core content policies, but with slightly different wording. Nearly all, because a lot of the smaller lacks them, and a lot has outdated or only partial policies. It takes a lot of time to actually make them and keep them updated.
Creating and maintaining the core content policies should not be something that small projects should invest a lot of time in, they should simply be able to point to existing policies on Meta. The central policies should be localized if necessary.
Checking Meta I find
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/The_no_original_research_policy
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Neutral_point_of_view
I can't find anything like "Verifiability".
Would it be possible for Wikimedia Foundation to make some sound baseline policies, and with the option for local projects to refine those? Perhaps with assistance from editors on Wikipedia?
Lets try to make the policies accurate, without "no original research" diverging into verifiability of external sources. It should be about original research in content on Wikipedia. Likewise, at some projects neutral point of view has become "do not diverge from creators point of view"…
Would this be possible? It would be really nice if those baseline policies pages could be copied to the individual projects like central user pages, so they would be "internal" to the projects. Thus the projects would have more "ownership" of them.
The same thing apply to other meta projects (Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wiktionary, etc).
Jeblad _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe