Hi Romaine,
Are there other evals of WLM projects that capture the complexity you want?
Perhaps single-community evaluations done by the WLM organizers there?
Sam
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Romaine Wiki <romaine.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
In the past months the Wikimedia Foundation has been writing an evaluation
about Wiki Loves Monuments. [1]
At such it is fine that WMF is writing an evaluation, however they fail in
actual understanding Wiki Loves Monuments, and that is shown in the
evaluation report.
As a result on the Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list a discussion grows
about the various problems the evaluation has.
As the Learning and Evaluation team at the Wikimedia Foundation already had
released the first Programs Reports for Wiki Loves Monuments, we are now
put as fait accompli with this evaluation report.
Therefore I am writing here so that the rest of the worldwide Wikimedia
community is informed that this is not going right.
Wiki Loves Monuments is not just a bunch of uploads done in September, the
report is too simplified without actual understanding how the community is
doing this project.
Romaine
[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Evaluation/Evaluation_reports/2015/W…
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>