On 12 December 2014 at 12:47, Fæ <faewik(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So, I'm genuinely afraid to say it was more of an
emotive response.
The extensive criticism of Commons administrators made was not well
founded. That images had to be removed and that there were
consequences was an issue that should have been better managed. The
law and evidence presented (or its inadequacy in terms of
verifiability) is not the fault of Commons administrators as a class,
in practice this was a complex case and a highly politically charged
one, Commons should not be hung out to dry because of it.
Commons was raising quasi-legal objections that literally nobody else
considered a plausible threat model. It's your fault as long as you
continue to defend it.
- d.