On 12 December 2014 at 12:47, Fæ faewik@gmail.com wrote:
So, I'm genuinely afraid to say it was more of an emotive response. The extensive criticism of Commons administrators made was not well founded. That images had to be removed and that there were consequences was an issue that should have been better managed. The law and evidence presented (or its inadequacy in terms of verifiability) is not the fault of Commons administrators as a class, in practice this was a complex case and a highly politically charged one, Commons should not be hung out to dry because of it.
Commons was raising quasi-legal objections that literally nobody else considered a plausible threat model. It's your fault as long as you continue to defend it.
- d.