On 4/17/2014 7:37 AM, Russavia wrote:
So
how about a simple WMF policy that states something along the lines of:
"Employees and contractors of the Wikimedia Foundation shall not edit
articles relating to the Wikimedia Foundation, broadly construed, but at
rather directed to raise potential edits on the talk pages of affected
articles. This directive does not apply to the reverting vandalism,
removing copyright violations or potentially libellous materials."
To
illustrate how silly this can get on some level, consider the fact
that justifiably or not, the media and the general public often treat
the content of Wikimedia projects as if it reflects on the reputation of
the Wikimedia Foundation. Thus when "broadly construed", any edit to any
article could in a sense be charged with a conflict of interest because
it's an effort to make the Wikimedia Foundation look better. So
basically staff would not be allowed to edit at all, and the second part
of this policy would amount to no more than a limited exception under
which all edits have to be made, or at the very least vetted, by the
legal department.
That in turn would lead to an atmosphere in which staff edits must be
considered authoritative and cannot be challenged or altered by the
community, which I really don't think is the direction we should go. The
occasional deference Pete was concerned about is already a distortion of
the normal editing dynamic, and not something we want to try and spread
more widely.
--Michael Snow