Mike,
If we're thinking about having article generators produce articles "on the
fly" and deliver them to millions of readers in response to queries,
especially in foreign languages, then that doesn't meet my definition of
"that isn't what is intended at all, obviously".
Andreas
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Michael Peel <email(a)mikepeel.net> wrote:
On 16 Feb 2016, at 00:26, Andreas Kolbe
<jayen466(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Here is another such example. Jimmy Wales has tonight told[1] a volunteer
---o0o---
First the idea that Wikidata could be used to "construct articles" with
"no
need for editors to edit actual article
content" is pretty absurd from a
technological point of view. Major breakthroughs in AI would be
necessary. That isn't what is intended at all, obviously.
That seems logical. Wikidata can in principle provide basic articles that
can then be improved by editors, but at the moment it's just getting up to
the standard where it can provide infobox contents. Or do you think that
Wikidata can provide FA-quality articles already?
Thanks,
Mike
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>