--- On Fri, 5/15/09, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+wikilist(a)gmail.com> wrote:
From: Aryeh Gregor
<Simetrical+wikilist(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Wikipedia is not the Kama Sutra, was Re: commons and freely
licensed sexual imagery
To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List"
<foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Date: Friday, May 15, 2009, 1:26 PM
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:33 AM,
Birgitte SB <birgitte_sb(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
Your really didn't address my question. Why
do you
think WMF resources are best used to create and support a
mirror for people who are disgusted by sexuality rather than
making easier for third-parties to create mirrors for *any*
of different of audiences in the world that find various
different things unacceptable?
I don't, and I'm not sure why you think I do. I
explicitly stated
that I favored a categorization system whereby users can
filter out
whatever content they personally find objectionable, and
display
whatever they don't. I also never said WMF resources
should be spent
on anything, and I definitely don't support creating entire
mirrors
just for the sake of image content when you could just hide
or display
the images inline. So I'm not sure what you mean at
all.
Well you now snipped it all, but someone suggested creating mirror under a different
domain name for schools. I replied to that saying how I thought resources were best
spent. Then you replied to me.
If you weren't replying to me to disagree with me, I have no idea what you intended.
But I thought disagreement with me was a pretty safe assumption from the tone of your
message.
Birgitte SB