> But since Milos asked: In Wikisource changing the
original is indeed
> vandalism, but somebody must notice that it's vandalism. AFAIK
Wikisource
> doesn't have a proper way to authenticate
that the document is in its
> original form.
Could you elaborate on this? If you open the links in
my email, you
will see that the text can be verified against the edition on file,
Do you mean the side-by-side ProofreadPage view?
and Wikisource projects typically have *revision*
patrolling enabled
to help catch incorrect changes.
Revision patrolling is less bulletproof than a checksum, but if it is
enough for the people who care about this normative grammar's integrity,
it's certainly enough for me.