On 2 March 2010 13:04, Peter Gervai <grinapo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Which does not imply it's been a failure. But
generally my measure would be
a) bad mood/stress level of the editors doing patrolling (which by my
educated guess went down), and
b) the incidents of indecent/unwanted content appearing for the wide
public (which by my observation definitely went down, my guess is
close to zero).
What about c) people not editing (or not continuing to edit) because
they don't like their edits not going live immediately? Any data on
that?