On Wednesday 09 April 2008 00:20:50 geni wrote:
On 08/04/2008, Nikola Smolenski
<smolensk(a)eunet.yu> wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008 23:16:34 geni wrote:
On 08/04/2008, Nikola Smolenski
<smolensk(a)eunet.yu> wrote:
> >I am aware that there are use cases
that are
> > inbetween. Yet most of the cases fall in two clearly separate
> > categories: one for which I do want the enhancement to my work
> > to be freely reusable, and one for which I am content with my
> > work illustrating an unrelated work.
>
> Meaningless since you will not define which is which.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuum_fallacy
Okey I acknowledge there are grey areas. I deal with grey areas all
the time. However I gave you a list of partical real world examples.
If you are unable to sort them then your position is useless.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(logic)
Argument by wikilink?
Okey then lets go through this one more time
Is a caption an enhancement to your work?
Is being made part of a collage an enhancement to your work?
Is being made part of a flow chart an enhancement to your work?
Is a title an enhancement to your work?
Is a histogram an an enhancement to your work?
None of it matters. Being used to illustrate a text on unrelated subject is
NOT an enhancement to my work, I don't see the need to affect the copyright
of the text, and that is all that I am saying.