On 17 April 2014 08:46, Erik Moeller <erik(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
...
On this, you and I seem to be about as far apart as we
can be, so we
will have to agree to disagree. This is why in threads like the Belfer
one I encourage people to stay cool and not let this stuff get to
their heads, because this is the kind of moral panicky BS we need to
stay the hell clear of.
Staying cool is something we can all agree with.
However when long term senior managers of the Foundation respond to
respectfully written whistle-blowing messages such as Russavia's or
Tomasz' previous blog post by deriding them as raising "moral panicky
[Bull Shit]", you are putting these words in the mouths of your CEO
and Board of Trustees. If this is the vulgar way that the Foundation
wishes to be publicly represented, I would be very surprised.
This is not the first time that Erik has been sarcastic and rude in an
apparent attempt to close down discussion in public responses to
whistle-blowers. Perhaps Sue or one of the Trustees would like to say
something about their expectation for exemplary and mellow behaviour
towards the Wikimedia Community from their senior management team?
Thanks,
Fae
--
faewik(a)gmail.com
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae