On 11/09/2007, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
In any
plausible situation where the GFDL is viewed as valid at all,
this is more "flagrantly wrong" rather than "not perfectly clean".
You
can't simply reappropriate people's intellectual property and declare
that henceforth it will be used in a way they didn't consent to...
Unless you're a joint author...
Surely [selling, relicensing, releasing, whatever] a work of joint
authorship requires the consent of [both/all] authors?
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk