On 11/09/2007, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
In any plausible situation where the GFDL is viewed as valid at all, this is more "flagrantly wrong" rather than "not perfectly clean". You can't simply reappropriate people's intellectual property and declare that henceforth it will be used in a way they didn't consent to...
Unless you're a joint author...
Surely [selling, relicensing, releasing, whatever] a work of joint authorship requires the consent of [both/all] authors?