Anthony wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
<cimonavaro(a)gmail.com
wrote:
Frankly, as a person who thinks nothing of
enjoying a sauna
with members of the other gender of any age, I think you are
overstating it considerably to say *all* of us think the image is
even mildly controversial, except for the perverted sense of
shame many cultures have bestowed on the natural human
body form.
Give me a break. You don't have to have a perverted sense of shame about
the natural human body form to take a stand against the sexual exploitation
of young child for the purposes of selling a heavy metal album.
Wow, how involved can you make a logical statement. Would I break
your rebuttal of my stement, I would say that you can only exploit
that which is exceptional and rarified in the market.
If you can see nekkid pre- and postpubescent girls as a matter of
course at a sauna, there is no ability to exploit it at all.
There are many photographs of nudity on Wikipedia.
Only *one* of them
caused this controversy, and the one that caused it was *not* chosen
randomly.
Well, if it wasn't chosen randomly, I just will say the ones choosing
need to look at where their testicles and brain pan is, not necessarily
in that order.
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen