Hi again,
Another potentially interesting podcast for some touching this matter
(more or less):
Linked to the ones I sent before on the other thread.
If this is the new Napster revolution equivalent, yeah I know... back in
the day, buckle up!
Cheers,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023, 17:33 Jimmy Wales <jimmywales(a)wikitribune.com>
wrote:
Speaking only for myself, out of curiosity, some
real world examples
might be helpful here. I don't have access to Bing's
version yet, but I do have access to
chat.openai.com which is very
impressive but deeply flawed.
I asked "Who is Kate Garvey?" (my wife, known a bit to the media, but not
famous) and the answer is weird and laughably bad with
more sentences false than true. Among other silly things, it says that
she worked for Theresa May and was involved
with Brexit negotiations, which if you knew my wife's politics borders on
libel. It also says she co-founded an organization
(which as far as I can tell, it just made up out of thin air) with Nick
Clegg's wife. It's completely mad.
On 2023-02-20 09:34, Anders Wennersten wrote:
BIng with ChatGPT is now released by Micrsoft.
> > And from what I
understand they use Wikipedia content considerably. >
If you ask Who is A B
and A B is not widely known, the result is more > or less identical to the
content from the Wikipedia article (but > worse, as it "makes up" facts
that is incorrect). > > In a way I am glad to see Wikipedia is fully
relevant even in this > emerging AI-driven search world. But Google search
has ben careful to > always have a link to Wikipedia besides their made up
summary of > facts, which here it is missing (yet?). And for licences, they
are > all ignored. > > So if this is the future the number of accesses from
users to > Wikipedia will collapse, and also their willingness to donate...
(but > our content still a cornerstone for knowledge) > > Anders > > (I
got
a lot of fact from an article in Swedish main newspaper by > their tech
editor. He started asking fact of himself, and when he > received facts
from his Wp article plus being credited to a book he > had noting to do
with, he started to try to tell/learn ChatGPT of > this error. The chatPGT
only got angry accusing the techeditor for > lying and in the end cut off
the conversation, as ChatGPT continued > to teat the techeditor as lyer and
vandal..). > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l
mailing > list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at >
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
> To unsubscribe send an email to
wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at: