geni geniice@gmail.com writes:
Having no banners and no servers to serve the artuicles are even worse. Having payed the dangeld to get rid of them, I think most are happy being acknowledged for the fact.
You miss the point. The banners are not fundraising any more (unless you collapse them)
Most of the whining you have seen is about the actual fundraising banners. Unless you google alaert for wikipedia and wikimedia gives you other results than mine.
I don't agree on that point. Having extorted 6+ million $ out of the readers with a Jesus headline, and then switching the thank you note to leagal flyspeck, would send the wrong signal. If we NEED Joe Bloggs meney, we'd better THANK him in the same way. Otherwise he may OVERLOOK the plea next time it comes around.
Any evidence for those claims? And how about thanking him by not degrading his wikipedia experience?
I claim nothing else than it's my own opinion. Excuse me for getting that part wrong (I'm not a native english speaker), but I would've thought that "I think" would indicate that.