On 22 February 2012 03:04, Mike Godwin mnemonic@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:35 PM, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
The post-facto probability of 1.0 that the researcher was in fact professional, credible, and by all accounts right does not mean that a priori he should automatically have been treated that way before the situation was clarified.
Should we declare that "Assume Good Faith" is now a dead letter?
It's been dead for new editors for a while. New editors are assumed to be a problem, to be processed as quickly as possible with Twinkle or similar in the manner of a processed cheese slice. "Assume good faith" is what the processors then say when the newbie protests at being treated in this manner.
- d.
- d.