On 22 February 2012 03:04, Mike Godwin <mnemonic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:35 PM, George Herbert
<george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> The post-facto probability of 1.0 that the
researcher was in fact
> professional, credible, and by all accounts right does not mean that a
> priori he should automatically have been treated that way before the
> situation was clarified.
Should we declare that "Assume Good Faith"
is now a dead letter?
It's been dead for new editors for a while. New editors are assumed to
be a problem, to be processed as quickly as possible with Twinkle or
similar in the manner of a processed cheese slice. "Assume good faith"
is what the processors then say when the newbie protests at being
treated in this manner.
- d.
- d.