Thank you, Nataliia, for stepping forward and clearing out some of the
confusion. That helps.
But not all the confusion gets cleared for me regarding the survey process.
For example, X marks Option 1 as 'Disagree' and Option 2 as 'Strongly
Disagree'. The score points for 'Disagree' is -1 and 'Strongly
Disagree' is
-2. Will the report say, 'X prefers Option 1 over Option 2', just because
mathematically -1 is greater than -2?
Please pardon my lack of understanding of reporting formats, as I could not
find the information on how the result of this survey will be interpreted
and presented to the board.
BR,
Shabab
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 22:55, Paulo Santos Perneta <paulosperneta(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
And there never was any insult or anything close to
that, just a
misunderstanding, which I believe was clarified.
A terça, 23 de jun de 2020, 08:56, revi <lists(a)revi.email> escreveu:
Hi,
2020. 6. 23. 14:13, Gnangarra
<gnangarra(a)gmail.com> 작성:
Nat insulted an ESEAP
affiliate because she wanted a European affiliate to endorse her
nomination.
Fact check: that was Shani Evanstein.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Affiliate-selected_Board_seats/2019/No…
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>