2008/4/30, Marco Chiesa <chiesa.marco(a)gmail.com>om>:
Erik Moeller ha scritto:
We're still waiting for the FDL 1.3. Since
there's been no resolution
within the timeframe we hoped for, we're going to re-allow the
creation of new Wikimedia wikis. To make sure that we can safely
transition to CC-BY-SA, we're going to dual-license them under
CC-BY-SA 3.0:
Won't this prevent writing articles translated from GFDL-only wikis? If
A licenses a text under GFDL, you cannot license a derivative under
cc-by-sa. And if we can transition the "old" GFDL-only wikis, why can't
we transition the new ones if we start them GFDL-only?
Cruccone
Same thought occurred to me. NL Wikibooks is also dual licensed, and
it is with that respect a small pain in the ass. I think that
especially for new wiki's with brand new users this is not very
practical, as they have already trouble enough to understand what a
free license is at all... (and now they'll be told that they can't
even translate articles from other Wikipediae, but they can translate
from french to english? :S)
I think it would be good if this would be reconsidered if this
argument did not come up yet.
BR, Lodewijk