On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, at 10:53, Pete Forsyth wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:46 PM, svetlana
<svetlana(a)fastmail.com.au> wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, at 23:42, Romaine Wiki
wrote:
That the community reacts the way it does now, is
because they care very
much about the site and they notice something is terrible going wrong on
WMF side and too less is done to fix those problems/issues!
if the community was not so willing to use force (ie a js hack) against
the other party
[...]
You talk about admin accountability, Svetlana -- but what about
accountability for the WMF, when it makes sweeping changes that (among
other things) remove any suggestion of an "edit" functionality from "the
encyclopedia anyone can edit" from millions and millions of pages?
Pete
[[User:Peteforsyth]]
Surely this issue can be solved by talking without force: if you don't think so, you
get force applied to YOU; you started a fight, and lost it. Because you went and did
something contradicting user preferences; WMF did not. You'd think it's
"better" because it's "unchanged compared to what it was X months
ago", and that justifies your thing? No, it does not.