On 15 September 2012 07:24, とある白い猫 <to.aru.shiroi.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am not seeking legal advice. I am asking the pursuit of the issue. I am
not a US citizen so I do not have a congress person to contact. The laws
governing copyright can be amended to address the issue of deep space
objects (DSO). I do not expect a result next week, I merely want the issue
to enter into an agenda of some sort. If the Foundation is going to take
the lead, this probably would only be possible through a board decision. In
such a case I want to work with people to come up with such a draft
proposal to the board.
I realize this is an unusual request but there seems to be a lack of
clarity on this issue[1]. Argument is that copyright can be an issue since
not every organization observing or assisting NASA's observations are
PD-USgov compatible. We may be forced to permanently delete all deep space
objects as a result.
I'd like to provide a short technical explanation why copyright of deep
space objects or DSOs (objects outside of the solar system) are
meaningless. For ordinary photographs copyright is determined by factors
such as lighting, perspective, exposure and other such settings that
creates a different image of the same object. You can distinguish the
difference between a daylight photo and an evening photo.
With deep space objects however, even the stellar parallax[2] has a very
small value. The closest object outside of the solar system is 4.24 light
years (268,136 AU's) away. The semi-major axis of earth is about 1AUs. The
difference in perspective is like looking at a 2cm (width of a nickel) wide
object 5.3km (3.29 miles) away and the perspective difference is switching
left eye to the right eye. We lack scientific instruments to even detect a
stellar parallax for objects much further. In other words our perspective
of the nearest star and beyond is more or less constant and the objects
themselves look the same for hundreds of years.
So any photo of a deep space object I or someone else takes from the
solar system will look identical regardless of when and where on earth I
take it within multiple lifetimes.
Not so. The results from the Atacama Desert are going to be far
clearer than the results from say Snowdonia. That is before we
consider the issues of different filters, exposure times and
instruments.
If you claim was true we could just team up with a couple of amateur
observetories (one in each hemisphere) and retake all the deep sky
images (which might not be an entirely bad thing anyway).
--
geni