I think if you are going to be releasing images or video you would be
better using a Creative Commons license or similar. The RPL (like the GPL
it's based on) is significantly more designed for source code and programs
and the requirements make media much harder to reuse.
James Alexander
Legal and Community Advocacy
Wikimedia Foundation
(415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Todd Allen
<toddmallen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Uh, wait. Please answer the question clearly and
unambiguously. What
exact
license will the proposed contributions be
under?
On Jul 18, 2014 2:06 PM, "Milos Rancic" <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think that the best one is Reciprocal Public License [1]. What do you
think?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocal_Public_License
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>