On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
A good 3D version would be useful because it would
allow us to derive
a good vector version of the logo. ... with the amount of interest in
the number of toys, schwag, etc, I'd suggest that we do create a
definitive 3D version. The most obvious filler for the back would be
the rest of the "W" letters.
Not that this is a reason not to do it, but we'll inevitably have
people asking for variant logos (different rotations) when their
project's script is represented on the "dark side" of the wikiball.
(And if we're being cynical, we can imagine an argument over which
view of the ball is best representative of our projects, or most
relevant, or most aesthetically pleasing, or what have you.)
Austin