Andre Engels wrote:
Wikimedia's goal is the spread and promotion of knowledge.
Wikibuilder's goal is the spread and promotion of knowledge of a
large section of human understanding (relating to our very survival
on this planet). Wikibuilder fits the ideals of Wikimedia, there
really is no denying this.
There's thousands of 'large sections of human understanding'.
That wasn't actually the operative point. What's makes it compatible
with Wikimedia's ideals is the fact that its goal is the spread and
promotion of knowledge (it just happens to be a very large and
important portion of knowledge). i.e. it fits the criteria for a new
project proposal. Whether people think we should do it is another
question. Conflating these two points isn't useful.
That's not enough to cut it for me. What is it
that makes 'the built
environment' more suitable to such a treatment? What is it you want to
do in wikibuilder anyway? The term is rather vague, so I'd like to see
some more explanation.
Take a look at:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikibuilder
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikibuilder
Christiaan