This is a two week delayed thread. I would agree that it is quite useless
now given the nature of the involved parties so far.
- White Cat
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 6:05 PM, effe iets anders <effeietsanders(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
What are you trying to do here? You come in, shout
about something
irrelevant, and send the message again but then with cc to jimmy and
florence (why?), and then repost another message. This seems like a
useless thread on this list <glare at michael and/or austin>
-- Lodewijk
2008/5/29, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com>om>:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Kwan Ting Chan
<ktc(a)ktchan.info> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 15:25 +0100, geni wrote:
> > 2008/5/18 White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com>om>:
> > > Since this issue is about en.wikipedia's arbcom foundation-l is
the
> place to
> > > discuss this.
> > >
> > > Right now we have an Arbitration Committee that has declared
ownership
> over
> > > Arbitration related sub pages. Arbitrators will not allow
community or
> members of the community to edit or restructure
these pages.
Fair enough they are free to do that if they so chose.
(Ignoring whether this should be at foundation-l or wikien-l)
Erm, why?
KTC
--
Experience is a good school but the fees are high.
- Heinrich Heine
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l