Erik Moeller wrote:
On 9/5/07, Florence Devouard
<Anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
My use of the term open here is related to the
freedom of participation.
Not the freedom of software.
OK. :) Right now I'm trying to figure out if you have any specific
objections related to the wording of the current draft statement. ;-)
I do not like the idea of it being a policy. The term "policy" is really
too strong. "Statement of principles" is much better.
Then, I can list Values, eg
Knowledge without boundaries
Empowering
Pioneering
Consideration for others
Freedom
And link the last one to a couple of places, such as the "Statement of
principles regarding software use" and "licensing policy".
Considerations for others might link to "privacy policy" for example
etc