On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Casey Brown <lists(a)caseybrown.org> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:29 PM,
Brian<Brian.Mingus(a)colorado.edu> wrote:
I recall convincing arguments on this list that
meta was the appropriate
place for this, rather than fragmenting into a new wiki. This is because
previously created wikis succumb to wiki rot and eventually link spam.
Why
were those arguments rejected?
Did you see Erik's comment by any chance?
<http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2009-July/053348.html>
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
No I hadn't, thank you.
It doesn't cover the most important case in my mind: meta is where people
actually are! A new wiki is not a magic recipe for an insta-community and
its hard to guarantee that everyone who would be interested in the content
there will end up seeing it.