Jay Walsh <jwalsh(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
We've seen a lot of comments about the size of the
puzzle globe, and I don't >disagree that it might benefit from being increased in
size slightly.
And shrinking makes the puzzle pieces - the cornerstone of the
original winning design - ambiguous. How ambiguous? For example in a
competitor's logo, a potato shape with the
same aforementioned puzzle pieces combine optically to create the
impression of a human brain:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Uncyclopedia.png
Seriously. The classic logo clearly deliniated the puzzle pieces with
strong lines. The current appears to overemphasize the shadow in the
back of the sphere - making the "3-D" sphere look in fact flat and a
bit non-spherical /warped.
-SC