2010/1/14 Jiří Hofman <hofmanj(a)aldebaran.cz>cz>:
It is clear that much of sex-related multimedia
stored in our project is of a very low quality, not meeting our requirements and needs.
Often, it doesn't provide what we are looking for - high quality information.
That isn't clear to me. Could you elaborate?
Originally, I was pretty angry with a mail by David Goodman. The video, he linked to, is a
disgusting manipulation. I went through images listed as sources for the video. And I had
to admit that at least some of those should not be a part of our projects. Not because
they are depicting sex-related things and activities but because they are of quality which
is would be unacceptable in many other fields.
Just go to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_intercourse . You will see there is no
really high quality image of human sexual intercourse. Strange for an encyclopedy which
wants to be the best in the world. Or go to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sex_positions , one of the most viewed pages of
English Wikipedia. Do you think the images there are of excellent quality? I don't.
Jiri