If I misread that part, my apologies. That still doesn't change the core
issue, that money is being offered, and that it's being offered for
quantity rather than quality.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Gergo Tisza <gtisza(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Todd Allen
<toddmallen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This project is going for 100k articles. There
are as of this writing 118
editors signed up. That is, even if we presume 100% participation (which
is
generally wildly optimistic), nearly 1000
articles per editor to reach
that
goal. If somehow that does happen, there are four
judges who would need
to
review, if the goal is reached, 25000 articles
each. Those are not
realistic numbers.
Come on. Did you even read the page you are talking about? Clearly you are
confusing it with the 100,000 Challange [1] which starts at the same time
but is a much larger project (the project page mentions a two-year
timeframe).
[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_
in_Red/The_100,000_Challenge
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>