Hi, Some works and study was done for Indic Wikimedia projects (there are 24 communities) after a detailed consultation and needs-assessment, please see: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Indic_Wikipedia_Policies_and_Guideli... There are three types of issues: a) Localizing policies (translating is not the only way, but localizing keeping a project in mind) b) Enforce them c) For smaller communities having a group of editors working on these
Thanks Tito Dutta Note: If I don't reply to your email in 2 days, please feel free to remind me over email or phone call.
On 2 August 2017 at 19:35, John Erling Blad jeblad@gmail.com wrote:
Nearly all Wikipedia projects has virtually the same core content policies, but with slightly different wording. Nearly all, because a lot of the smaller lacks them, and a lot has outdated or only partial policies. It takes a lot of time to actually make them and keep them updated.
Creating and maintaining the core content policies should not be something that small projects should invest a lot of time in, they should simply be able to point to existing policies on Meta. The central policies should be localized if necessary.
Checking Meta I find
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/The_no_original_research_policy
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Neutral_point_of_view
I can't find anything like "Verifiability".
Would it be possible for Wikimedia Foundation to make some sound baseline policies, and with the option for local projects to refine those? Perhaps with assistance from editors on Wikipedia?
Lets try to make the policies accurate, without "no original research" diverging into verifiability of external sources. It should be about original research in content on Wikipedia. Likewise, at some projects neutral point of view has become "do not diverge from creators point of view"…
Would this be possible? It would be really nice if those baseline policies pages could be copied to the individual projects like central user pages, so they would be "internal" to the projects. Thus the projects would have more "ownership" of them.
The same thing apply to other meta projects (Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wiktionary, etc).
Jeblad _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe