Ryan Kaldari wrote:
I thought you were awarding the post a score of 0 :)
It would be all too cheap a jibe to attribute to a self-proclaimed
philosopher an ignorance of scientific method and assert that blind adoption
of the continuity principle is contrary to that method; however, it is fair
to say that his interests largely lie in medieval philosophy and may not
reach as far as the works of Karl Popper, let alone the Renaissance.
So I will not level that accusation.