Romaine,
Building on Chico's comment, I put together an example notebook of how to
estimate such a list from the public data in case you're curious (I
calculated it for January-November for Nigeria in the example). It's not a
perfect approach in that it makes some assumptions and uses incomplete data
but probably is close to what the actual list would be (details in the
link). You'd likely want to use your knowledge of the region/languages to
filter out pages like Special:Search and bot-driven views that slipped
through into the data (like Cookie and Cleopatra in the example below).
Notebook:
You can read instructions for how to copy this notebook and run it for
other countries here:
Best,
Isaac
Copying the top-100 output for Nigeria below for ease of access:
article views
1
25300
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 7:41 PM Romaine Wiki <romaine.wiki(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
For some languages it is easy as a particular
language is spoken in one
country mainly. (Still there might be some local languages/dialects that
are then not represented in the data.)
For some other languages is is not easy to get the statistics of the most
visited pages of a country as the language is spoken in multiple countries.
If for example one country only has 3% of the population in comparison to
another country with the same language, the language statistics are very
biased. The larger country consumes so much data, that the data of the
country with the smaller population is invisible. If we have no data for
them, we let those unseen communities down.
Romaine
Op wo 7 dec. 2022 om 18:21 schreef Jan Ainali <ainali.jan(a)gmail.com>om>:
On Swedish Wikipedia we collect it on one page:
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mest_visade_artiklar_2022
Doing it per language is much easier than per country, as the data is
publicly available.
Best,
Jan Ainali
Den ons 7 dec. 2022 kl 16:36 skrev Romaine Wiki <romaine.wiki(a)gmail.com
:
Every year it reaches the headlines of the news:
the top 10 or top 100
of most visited Google searches of the past year in my country. This I have
seen in some other countries too.
People are interested and with making this data public, something
positive is said about Google (besides all the negatieve news about them
during the rest of the year).
This is something simple Wikimedia could do too: sharing this kind of
data (*by country*) with the world. It would bring Wikipedia closer to the
public, more positive awareness.
Or otherwise making this data available to the local chapters so they
can bring positive news about Wikipedia.
Romaine
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
--
Isaac Johnson (he/him/his) -- Senior Research Scientist -- Wikimedia
Foundation
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at: