Re: [Foundation-l] Important notice -- please confirm your unblock-en-l subscription

I can't help thinking morerover that the lisrt administrator of "unvlock-en-l", Essjay and Mindspillage have had many sockpuppets beyond "Luna" and "Predego" and abused admin's power. What can you do for people(Wikipedians) besides listen to them? On 02 Mar 2007, unblock-en-l-owner wrote: By what reasons? "Luna", who is suspected strongly the sockpuppet of the list administrator of "Unblock-en-l", said, "You can request to re-join the list at any time". So, I have already requested it to the list administrators and the trustees. Therefore, I have no need to be ordered by Lunacy-like persons. Please don't reject my message "automatically", Essjay and Mindspillage. (It is very useful!) >Can "Luna"'s personal email below be actually valid? > >>From: Luna <lunasantin(a)gmail.com> >>Subject: Important notice -- please confirm your unblock-en-l subscription >>Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:52:37 -0800 >> >>Dear unblock-en-l subscriber, >> >>We've recently decided to establish some membership criteria for this >>mailing list, > >When? >Where? >what kind of "membership criteria"? > >>and are in the process of removing subscriptions which do not meet those >>criteria. > >Why is there necessity to remove subscriptions of Unblock-en-l? >Admins already admitted too many unfair blockings enforced by crazy admins? > >If so. you only have to unblock all the victims of the crazy admins >and stop all the crazy persons' adminship. > >>In particular, we need to associate your email address with a particular >>Wikipedia account or identity. > >I had not a Wikipedia account and Wikipedia's admins apparently have >blocked >too many IP address users with no understandable reason. > >This means, admins themselves have been forcing many IP address >contributors >to have to subscribe "Unblock-en-l". > >Of course, anyone have freedom not to log in Wikipedia >and all Wikipedias have allowed IP address contributors to edit Wikipedias' >articles >since the beginning. > >I myself don't want to talk with crazy facism(and racism) admins of >Wikipedia. >Apparently Chinese, Koreans, etc. have occupied and controlled Wikipedia >very unfairly. > >I have to think: >are Chinese, Koreans, Mexican, etc. >who have never understood the value to respect democratic procedures and >human rights. > > >?In order to do that, please click on this link: >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Emailuser/Prodego > >"Prodego"? >Essjay, Mindspillage, Luna, Prodego, and any other admins have never >explained >the necessity to click on this link. >They have been only showing their stupid contradiction and their being evil >sockpuppeters. > >>PLEASE use "unblock-en-l identification" as your subject heading, to allow >>faster processing of your email. > >"Identification"? >If you want people to reveal their identification, you should do it first. >but, >even "Essjay"("Ryan Jordan"?), the admin of "unblock-en-l", have been only >lying >about his identity and apparently abusing sockpuppets. > >It is Essjay, Mindspillage, Luna, Prodego, and any other admins of >Wikipedia >to make public their real "identification" and only them. > > >>Do not email the user directly > >Why? >Because "Luna" is just the sockpuppet of "Essjay"? > >>-- you MUST use the Special:Emailuser feature, or your identity will not >>be confirmed. > >Why does "Luna" say "MUST"? >I don't know "Predego" at all. And "Predego" is not the list administrator >of "Unvlock-en-l". >And Luna" is one of the crazy (anti-Japanese-racism-)facism admins. >Like this: >>If you have not replied to this message within one week, your subscription >>will be cancelled. You can request to re-join the list at any time. > >"You can request to re-join the list at any time"? >Now, I request it. > >I have already requested it to the list administrators and the trustees. >So, I have no need to be ordered by Lunacy-like persons. > >>We apologize for this inconvenience, but hope that you understand the need >>for privacy and security, given the sensitive personal information that is >>sometimes discussed on this mailing list. > >"the need for privacy and security"? >If you say such a decent thing, never send such a crazy emai to people >and never compel them to do such dangerous things for their "privacy and >security". > >All admins should do is to make all admins reveal their real identity, >esp. Essjay, Mindspillage, Luna, Prodego. > > >>Thank you, >>-Luna > >Why "Luna"? >Why "Prodego"? >Why not "Essjay"? >Why not "Mindspillage"? > >I couldn't believe my eyes. > >The admin's term should be expired every year or every six months. > >Sincerly, >"Mileshand"(Christopher A. J. Russel) > >_________________________________________________________________ >Find what you need at prices you’ll love. Compare products and save at MSN® >Shopping. >http://shopping.msn.com/default/shp/?ptnrid=37,ptnrdata=24102&tcode=T001MSN20A0701 > > _________________________________________________________________ With tax season right around the corner, make sure to follow these few simple tips. http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Taxes/PreparationTips/PreparationTips.…